Archive for December, 2003

What’s In A Name?

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2003

Yesterday was intense, stressful, disturbing and exhausting. We took Joseph to the Sarkine Autism Center at Riley for a comprehensive evaluation. We had a diagnosis, (autism spectrum disorder), but that’s barely a start. I’ve never felt like I had a handle on what it meant, what he needed, how we could provide it if we could, and so on. We spoke to a social worker, a speech pathologist, a psychiatrist, a neurologist, and someone else whose title I never did get, but whose mission was to observe Joseph and how he played and interacted with other people and his environment (chairs, floor, my coat, available toys, etc.) during the adult conversation. When they said comprensive, they meant it. I came home utterly drained and exhausted.

Joseph’s been tested before, but never with us present. We had been told that our presence would skew the results. I don’t think it did; Joseph did look at me when he was bewildered, but a smile in reassurance was all he was looking for. And meantime, I got to see how he did without the compensations we’ve learned to provide. I saw my son through the eyes of a series of objective observers. I saw him try to follow simple directions, and fail, and not be given a second chance. I saw what I fear the world will see and respond to, and it broke my heart.

We have a new diagnosis. It is no longer “Autism spectrum”. It is simply “Autistic”. It’s no real surprise, and the name shouldn’t matter; he’s still the same sweet, smart, loving little boy.

And yet the name does matter. It matters in the battles we and he will have to fight to keep other people from putting artificial limitations on him. Really, there are as many types of autism as there are people who have it; generalizations about what an autistic person “can’t do” don’t make sense. My response is “try it”. No one knows what anyone can or cannot do unless they try. That’s as true of the neurotypical as of the autistic. It matters in the stereotyping he will face from educators, neighbors, whomever he must deal with. It matters, as he gets older, in the limitations and stereotypes he may apply to himself. I never want him to say “autistic people have no imagination, therefore I have no imagination.” With the label applied, that just became harder for us as parents to counter.

His communications skills are still below normal for his age. I am told his expressive language skills are ahead of his receptive skills. I’ll have to do some research on that. It’s counterintuitive, but what do I know? What I do know is that I shall have to sift carefully through what I am told. One of the generalizations out there is that as an autistic child, he won’t understand emotion. But when I was in tears over something last week, he understood that Mommy was sad. And he understood that kisses from Joseph would make me feel better. In the face of that, the generalizations can go hang.

Did I Miss A Memo?

Monday, December 1st, 2003

I just talked to one of my fledglings. She had been talking to a friend of hers who is worried about her 7 year old daughter. The child has been talking about suicide fairly frequently, and the mother is trying to figure out what to do. She has called my fledgling, and my fledgling has come straight to me.

Now, I’m glad this mother, whom I have never met, recognizes that this is not normal behavior for a 7 year old child and is looking for advice and help. That’s what a good mother would do. I am taking my own son to the Autism Center for a full day comprehensive evaluation, because I want to be sure that he gets what he needs. I’m all too aware of my own ignorance in this field, and while the school system has helped enormously, there are more skills needed to get on in the world than just those taught in school. I’m sure this mother is doing something similar.

What bewilders me is why my fledgling is calling me. I live in a different state, so I don’t know the social service agencies or what they do. I know no more about depression or psychological disturbance in children than any lay person does. And yet, as in many other situations in which I have similarly little experience, the question has come to me.

I’ll do my best with it. I won’t deny I have a few ideas, starting with calling the child’s pediatrician for an emergency appointment and talking to the school counselor to see if there’s anything happening to distress the child so deeply at school. I need to know more about it to go beyond that, and there wasn’t much time to talk earlier.

I’ll try to answer this woman’s questions, or help her figure out where to look for answers, but that still leaves my question. Did someone send a memo I missed saying something about sending tangled problems to my address? I’m used to it; heaven knows it’s been going on most of my life. But I’ve never found a satisfactory answer to the question behind all the questions – which is why I’m being asked these things in the first place.

Living In Limbo

Monday, December 1st, 2003

Anyone who doesn’t want to deal with the fallout of Dubya’s military policies is welcome to skip this entry. I wouldn’t blame you. I’ve reached the stage of saturation where all too often I turn off the radio when news of more disasters in Iraq comes on. Sure, we all told the Powers That Be so, but they aren’t listening to that any more than they were listening when we little individuals were chanting, marching, and quietly letter-writing about it.

But I heard on today’s news that a hundred or so of the men held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba since the “War on Terror” was inaugurated in Afghanistan are to be released. They’ve been held for more than two years, with no charges filed against them, no idea when or if they will ever be released, no rights to attorneys or recourse to courts. Because Guantanamo Bay is in Cuba, the argument goes, U.S. Courts have no jurisdiction. Because they are not enemy soldiers but “unlawful combatants”, the Geneva Conventions regarding prisoners of war don’t apply. The Bush administration has found a neat little corner of geographical and legal limbo, and dropped these men into it. How convenient. How utterly shameful.

At the same time they prate piously about granting freedoms to the Iraqis, about supporting the cause of justice throughout the world, they have visited precisely the same sort of injustice on these men that they have decried assorted tyrants for visiting on their people. No, the prisoners aren’t being executed without trial – but our laws also don’t allow people to be held without trial or charge. It’s one of the fundamental founding principals to which our President gives such ardent lip-service and so enthusiastically guts in the name of “fighting terrorism” and “protecting freedom and democracy throughout the world”. You know, I hadn’t heard that particular line used to justify gutting freedom and democracy since I was a kid in the 60′s.

It’s time and well past time that these men were released, if they aren’t to be charged. It’s time and well past time their status was clarified. They’ve been left to try to fight mist and respond to ghosts, and that’s just plain wrong. I am ashamed of the administration that came up with this sleaze, and ashamed of the Congress that has allowed it to go on for fear of being branded as an opponent of the “war on terrorism”. Anyone looking for un-American activities now need look no further than the creation and maintenance of the limbo called Guantanamo Bay. Unfortunately, the folks who have authority in this seem to have had their sense of shame surgically amputated.